Transmissible
spongiform encephalopathy agents: safe working and the prevention of infection
| Frequently asked questions on the ACDP Guidelines
- "TSEs: Safe Working and the prevention of infection" |
The Frequently Asked Questions below are specifically aimed to provide
more information for healthcare workers. Please note, in the following
section the "Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy agents: safe
working and the prevention of infection" guidelines will be referred
to as the ACDP TSE Guidance.
General questions
Identification of patients with or at risk of CJD
Advice on CJD infection control in specialist areas
Advice on decontamination
Further information and links
General questions
Where can I find the most recent advice?
The revised ACDP TSE guidance was published in June 2003 to replace the
edition issued in 1998. The 2003 guidance continues to be updated by the
ACDP TSE Working Group as further scientific information becomes available
or future policy decisions need to be reflected. The publication date
of each section is given at the foot of every page and any amended sections
are clearly marked with the date of revision.
Identification of patients with or at risk of CJD
My patient has told me that he/she has received growth hormone - how
do I know if this was pituitary-derived or synthetic growth hormone? Should
my patient be considered at risk of CJD for public health purposes?
Recipients of pituitary-derived growth hormone should be regarded as at
risk of iatrogenic CJD for public health purposes, as detailed in Table
4a of Part 4 of the guidelines. In the UK, human pituitary-derived growth
hormone was banned in 1985 but the use of human-derived products may have
continued in other countries. As it is highly unlikely that pituitary-derived
growth hormone would have contained the vCJD infectious agent, recipients
should be considered as at risk of iatrogenic CJD but not vCJD.
My patient received a dura mater graft - should he/ she be considered
at risk of all forms of CJD including vCJD for public health purposes?
Recipients of dura mater should be considered as at risk of iatrogenic
CJD but not vCJD. Dura mater grafts were discontinued in August 1992 and
the first case of vCJD was identified in 1996 in the UK and reported later
in other countries. It is therefore very unlikely that the dura mater
graft would have contained the vCJD infectious agent. Moreover, the majority
of dura mater used in the UK was sourced from cadavers from outside the
UK.
My patient has been told they shouldn't donate blood because they
have been transfused in the past - does this mean he/she should be considered
at risk of CJD for public health purposes due to receipt of blood components
or plasma derivatives?
Not necessarily - only certain patients who have received transfusion
or plasma-products are to be considered as 'at-risk' for public health
purposes. These patients have been contacted and informed they are 'at-risk'.
Please see the footnote to Table 4a in Part 4. The Blood Services ask
all previously transfused (in UK) people not to donate blood - but only
a few of these people are considered 'at-risk' for public health purposes.
How can I ensure all my patients are effectively assessed before surgery
to identify patients with or at risk of CJD?
Guidance on assessments to be carried before surgery or endoscopy to
identify patients with or at risk of CJD has recently been added to the
TSE Guidance as Annex J. This cross-refers to the CJD risk categorisation
of patients is given in paragraphs 4.16 -4.17 and Table 4a of Part 4 of
the TSE Guidance. Effective pre-surgery assessment should be carried out
before any surgical or endoscopic procedure that may involve contact with
tissues with high or medium level infectivity.
< Back to top
Advice on CJD infection control in specialist areas
Where can I find advice on endoscopes and CJD infection control?
Advice on endoscopes and CJD infection control is given in Annex F of
the ACDP TSE Guidance. This guidance was significantly revised in November
2005 to clarify the vCJD transmission risks associated with different
types of endoscopic procedures and to identify which endoscopic procedures
should be considered invasive. A consensus statement between the British
Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Decontamination Working Group and the
TSE expert Working Group was also published in November 2005 to explain
the rationale behind Annex F.
Where can I find advice on dialysis and CJD infection control?
Guidance on dialysis and CJD will be available shortly (to be published
as Annex G of the TSE Guidance). Please check back to the TSE Guidelines
webpage to see if the guidance has been published or alternatively contact
the secretariat, asking for an email alert when this annex is published.
Where can I find advice on ophthalmology and CJD infection control?
SEAC issued advice on lenses and ophthalmic devices touching the surface
of the eye and CJD infection control in 2001:
www.seac.gov.uk/summaries/summ_0601.htm.
Guidance was also issued by the College of Optometrists/Association of
British Dispensing Opticians in 2001. A sub-group of the ACDP TSE Working
Group is to be convened shortly to consider ophthalmology and CJD in detail
and to take into account any new evidence. Further ACDP guidance is expected
to be published in 2007.
< Back to top
Advice on decontamination
Are there any alternatives to the decontamination agents listed in
Annex C now available e.g. to use for decontamination of surfaces in contact
with high or medium risk material from definite, probable or high risk
cases?
At present no. However, the advice given regarding decontamination in
Annex C, alongside the rest of the TSE guidance, is monitored as new information
and findings become available. In addition, the TSE Working Group works
closely with another committee, ESAC-Pr (Engineering and Science Advisory
Committee into the Decontamination of surgical instruments including prion
removal), which will evaluate new technologies effective at inactivating
prions. It is important that until the efficacy of products and technologies
claiming to remove/inactivate prion protein from contaminated medical
devices in laboratory and clinical practice, is established fully against
human prions, clinicians and laboratory managers should ensure that the
current ACDP TSE guidelines are followed.
How should novel decontamination technologies be evaluated?
SEAC have recently considered this issue and published a SEAC position
statement on methods to evaluate decontamination technologies for surgical
instruments. This is available from:
www.seac.gov.uk/statements/statement310806.htm
< Back to top
Further information and links
See the further information and links page.
< Back to TSE guidance
|