|
|
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Present: Professor Norman Nevin (Chair), Mrs Debbie Beirne, Professor Martin Gore, Professor Terry Hamblin, Professor Jim Neil, Rev Dr Lee Rayfield, Dr Adrian Lepper, Dr Michael Waterhouse, Dr Richard Ashcroft, Professor Andrew Lever, Dr Caroline Benjamin, Professor David Harrison, Mr Michael Harrison, Mrs Fiona Sandford, Professor Alex Markham, and Dr Peter Harris. Observer: Dr Mike Mackett (HSE). Secretariat: Dr Jayne Spink, Dr Monika Preuss, and Mr Daniel Gooch.
The minutes were agreed, subject to a few minor amendments, as an accurate and true record of the meeting. Update on White Paper commitments. The Secretariat gave a brief update on progress on the Government's White Paper's gene therapy commitments. The Commissioning Panel had met, and an announcement on funding was expected within a few weeks. No decision on the £4 million vector production commitment has yet been made. Update on the clinical trials regulations. The Secretariat had obtained agreement that GTAC will be named in the Clinical Trials Regulations as the UK body to deal with clinical gene therapy research. A specialist appeals mechanism will be provided. The proposed appeals mechanism was provided as a tabled paper, and Mr Michael Harrison was thanked for his input. Item 4 - GTAC 089: A Phase I/II Trial of a DNA vaccine given to patients
with prostate carcinomas with or without electroporation
Dr Harris declared a potential interest as he is a consultant to the trial sponsor. The protocol utilises Gene Directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy for prostate cancer. Tumours are injected with the study product (CTL102, adenovirus) which contains the nitroreductase (NTR) gene. Following delivery of CLT102, patients are dosed with the pro-drug (CB1954). Those tumour cells that produce NTR convert the pro-drug to a toxic form, leading to the death of the cancerous cells. Recent results had shown that the parameter to determine liver dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) might not be appropriate. The committee discussed several options for review of the trigger for DLT and agreed on the most appropriate parameter. The Secretariat was instructed to write to the proposers giving GTAC approval to the agreed revision.
The Committee went through the draft of the Tenth Annual Report, and a number of comments were made which the Secretariat would implement in the preparation of the final version for submission to Ministers for approval.
Antisense workshop. As a result of the discussion of the antisense trial at the last meeting, GTAC thought it was appropriate to organise a workshop on antisense trials to develop a strategy for processing applications in future. The Committee provisionally agreed on Wednesday 12 May 2004 as a suitable date for the workshop. A number of suggestions were made as to possible attendees, and it was thought that a primer session before the workshop could be useful. The public meeting 2004. The Secretariat suggested holding the GTAC open day in Cambridge on the day before or after the 21 July committee meeting. The Secretariat suggested holding both meetings in Cambridge. Possible topics for the open meeting were discussed. Training of Members. The Secretariat has received many valuable and positive comment / suggestions. The Chairman suggested that the Committee could fit in half-hour training elements to future agendas, at the beginning, and/or end, of the meeting. These could cover topics such as "storage of samples", "implications of clinical trial regulations", and "informed consent". The format could be discussion rather than presentation. An opportunity to visit a clinical gene therapy site could also be useful. GTAC/CSM recommendation (discussed by RAC) and clinical trial compensation guidelines. Material regarding the above was included for information.
Provided was some background reading on the marketing of gene therapy drugs, viral vectors, and a research paper on the strategy of Gene Directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy (also used in the GTAC 055 study). There was also a copy of the Government statement on neuroscience following the decision by Cambridge University not to go ahead with its planned primate research centre. Also reproduced was an article in Nature on the continued resistance in the EU research community to the Clinical Trials Directive.
GTAC Secretariat
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||