Department of Health
DH Home
You are here:      Advisory bodies > UK National Influenza Pandemic Committee > Minutes
UKNIPC homepage
Terms of reference
Members
Minutes
Papers
Minutes

Meeting of the United Kingdom National Influenza Pandemic Committee (UKNIPC) held on 18 July 2005

  • Download minutes in Portable Document Format

Present Chair:

Sir Liam Donaldson Chief Medical Officer, Department of Health (DH)

Dr David Harper Head of Health Protection, International Health and Scientific Development, DH
Gerard Hetherington Head of Health Protection, DH
Dr Penny Bevan Head of Emergency Preparedness, DH
Dr David Salisbury Principal Medical Officer: Immunisation, DH
Dr Liz Jones Head of Patient Environment, DH
Dr Jim Smith Chief Pharmaceutical Officer, DH
John Hibbs Head of News, DH
Philip Selwood Civil Emergencies Committee
Dr Joyshri Sarangi Gloucestershire and Wilts HPU
Professor Pat Troop Health Protection Agency
Dr John Coakley Homerton Foundation Trust
Professor Kent Woods MHRA
Dr Mike Simmons National Assembly for Wales
Dr Stephen Inglis NIBSC
Dr Maureen Baker Royal College of General Practioners
Professor Peter Donnelly Scottish Executive
Dr Rashmi Shukla West Midlands Public Health Group
Dr Debby Reynolds DEFRA
Dr John James Hounslow PCT
Tom Griffin Local Government Association

Secretariat
Ms Siobhan Jones Department of Health
Mrs Pamela Gardiner Department of Health
Ms Jacintha Moore Department of Health

Apologies
John Bacon Department of Health
Professor Christine Beasley Chief Nursing Officer, DH
Dr Henrietta Campbell DHSSPSNI
Dr Lorraine Doherty DHSSPSNI
Sir Brian Briscoe Local Government Association
Dr David Salter National Assembly for Wales
Sir John Skehel National Institute for Medical Research
Dr Harry Burns Scottish Executive
Dr Elizabeth Stewart Scottish Executive
Lorraine Lambert South Tyneside NHS Trust
Dr Diana Grice Surrey and Sussex PCT
Dr Angela Dawe Lambeth PCT

1. Introduction and Welcome
The chairman welcomed everyone to the meeting.

2. Terms of Reference
Members were asked for their comments on the draft terms of reference. No comments were received and the terms of reference were agreed without change.

3. Cross-Government preparedness (Paper 02/05)
David Harper provided a brief summary of cross Government work on preparing for an influenza pandemic. As lead Government Department, the Department of Health was working with the Civil Contingencies Secretariat to co-ordinate the cross Government response.

Dr Harper also provided a summary of some of the different organisations and groups involved in preparing for an influenza pandemic, including the Scientific Advisory Group.

Questions and comments were invited on this item. Debby Reynolds suggested that there may some value in incorporating data on animal health into the wider collection of information for cross-Government decision making. David Harper undertook to pass this on to the cross Government working group. Dr Reynolds also mentioned that the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) would be undertaking a planning exercise on avian influenza next year.


4. Revising the UK National Influenza Pandemic Contingency Plan
Members were reminded that the plan was published in March 2005 and is currently being updated in response to comments received. The revised plan will be published in early Autumn. Gerard Hetherington outlined the key changes of the plan:
­ Updating the phases in line with the World Health Organization (WHO) phases;
­ Revising modelling assumptions as appropriate;
­ Additional information on projected numbers affected;
­ Reviewing plan in light of developments since publication.
Any comments on the plan should be forwarded to the Secretariat.


5. Actions taken by the Department to improve preparedness - General update [Paper 02/01]
Members were updated on actions taken by the Department to improve preparedness for an influenza pandemic. Questions were invited on the Department's work.

Vaccine development
Dr David Salisbury provided an update on current work undertaken by the Department. He also explained some of the difficulties and limitations inherent in developing a vaccine for a pandemic strain of influenza - for example, limited manufacturing capacity means that vaccine could currently only be produced for around 5-15% of the world's population.

Given that a vaccine specifically against pandemic influenza will not start to become available until 4-6 months after the strain has been identified, the Department of Health is considering what other measures could be taken to improve preparedness and reduce this delay as far as possible.

David Salisbury reported that the Department had met with six of the major influenza vaccine manufacturers to discuss their preparations for the production of a pandemic influenza vaccine. The Department would continue to work with manufacturers to ensure that the UK obtained access to vaccine as early as possible.

Any vaccine strategy will pose significant challenges in implementation. Even when a specific vaccine is available, supplies are likely to be limited in the early stages. The Department will be considering how to promote wider debate on some of the ethical issues posed.

H5N1 vaccine
H5N1 vaccines based on the strain of influenza currently circulating in South East Asia may play a role in improving preparations for an influenza pandemic. In discussion, the following points were made:
" Manufacturers have only a very small window (a couple of months) to manufacture non-seasonal flu vaccines such as H5N1.
" The H5N1 vaccine would be most effective if an influenza pandemic arose from this particular strain. The level of protection provided will depend on several factors including the extent to which the virus has evolved to be able to transmit from person to person.
" The Department had issued a tender to produce 'seed stock' vaccine for H5N1 and other strains, which should help reduce the time taken to produce a new vaccine. Pat Troop indicated that this work held some promise for reducing the delay in obtaining vaccine.
" One option being considered was to include H5N1 as one of the strains in the seasonal influenza vaccine developed annually. The strain could be introduced as an additional strain, but the vaccine would require a new license; or H5N1 could be used to replace an existing strain, but this would reduce the protection against strains that we know to be circulating. Options were still being considered, but vaccine for this winter is already being produced. However, a decision will be taken on this issue in liaison with the WHO in time for next year's vaccination campaign. Stephen Inglis suggested that this was a promising option worth raising again with manufacturers.
" Another option of interest internationally was to co-administer a H5N1 vaccine at the same time as the seasonal flu vaccine.

Research into novel vaccine techniques
Manufacture of a pandemic influenza vaccine is currently likely to use similar techniques to the production of normal flu vaccine. There are several limiting factors in this process, for example the reliance on egg supply. The Department is working with the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the National Institute of Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) to ensure that the necessary research is taken forward on vaccine development.


Other issues
Discussions also touched upon wider operational issues. These included:
" Identification of key health workers - it was agreed that early vaccination of key healthcare workers would be important in maintaining a capacity to provide healthcare.
" Identification of other key workers - it was noted that the identification of key workers in other sectors was the responsibility of other Government Departments. Cabinet Office were leading on this ongoing piece of work.
" Time for preparation - it was emphasised that the NHS needed as much time as possible to prepare.
" Information on distribution - the NHS will need further information on distributing antivirals and vaccine. It was noted that the Department was currently working on this and would provide information in due course.
" Clear policy on use of antivirals and vaccines - it was noted that the antiviral stockpile was for treatment only and that clear guidance would be needed on how antivirals and vaccines should be used. It was also noted that a separate policy might be needed before full stocks of medications were available.
" Prioritising vaccination in children - it was suggested that having children as a priority group to receive the vaccine may reduce transmission of the disease as children are known to be an efficient route of transmission. It was noted that the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) were considering current recommendations in relation to seasonal influenza.
" Natural immunity - it was suggested that plans should take into account that people may develop natural immunity to the pandemic strain after exposure to the virus.
" Testing for flu - the possible role of near patient diagnostic tests was considered and the Scientific Advisory Group had asked for further analysis to be undertaken by the Health Protection Agency. It was noted that the accuracy of these tests was low when there are a limited number of cases of influenza in the population.
" Advice for members of the public - research seen by the Health Protection Agency emphasised the role of simple hygiene measures in reducing the spread of SARS in the 2003 outbreak. It was noted that this was one of the key messages incorporated in the Department's communication materials intended for members of the public both before and during a pandemic. (For example, the information leaflet available on the Department's website www.dh.gov.uk/pandemicflu.)
" Importance of communications - Members were reminded of the importance of effective communication, both with healthcare professionals and members of the public. Further detail on the Department's communications strategy was given in paper 02/07.


Members were asked to email the secretariat with:
" Any areas where they had observed significant gaps in planning;
" Any areas where actions are not in place or not robust enough;
" Any suggestions for issues to be discussed at future meetings.


Next meeting
CMO suggested that the Committee should meet again in Autumn. The Secretariat would circulate dates shortly.

Top
copyright: © | Updated:
 

Search

 
 

    Entire site

Get Acrobat Reader

Download Adobe Acrobat reader for PDF files

Help with Portable Document Format (PDF)