|
|
 |
UK Stem Cell Initiative [UKSCI]
| Global positions in stem cell research |
Denmark
With an amendment to the existing Danish Act on Medically Assisted Procreation
it has been possible for Danish scientists to investigate human embryonic
stem cells from national sources from September 1, 2003. Only stem cells
derived from up to 14 days old human embryos developed from in vitro fertilised
eggs formed in excess for infertility treatment can be used, in keeping
with the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine of the European Council.
Danish embryonic stem cell research must be approved according to the
rules of the scientific ethical committee system.
After September 1 2003, academics expected a strategy and funds for the
Danish stem cell research but, to date, this has not materialized. A significant
part of the Danish stem cell research is undertaken and coordinated by
The Danish Centre for Stem Cell Research which was established in April
2002 based on 9 existing research groups from universities and private
research institutes.It was started with DKK 23.6 million in funding from
the Danish Research Council to cover five years. The centre has a virtual
structure and focus on both basic and applied stem cell research. Centre
partners are nine research groups located at the University of Southern
Denmark at Odense, Odense University Hospital, Copenhagen University and
Aalborg University, as well as the companies NsGene A/S, a cell therapy
spin-out from NeuroSearch A/S, Ballerup-Copenhagen, and the Novo Nordisk-associated
Hagedorn Research Institute in Gentofte.
At the same time a Stem Cell Research School DASCDOC for PhD-students
was established by a 5-year grant from the Danish Research Council. DASCDOC
is interdisciplinary, consisting so far of 19 research groups from Danish
universities and university hospitals, veterinary research institutions,
sector research institutions, and biotechnology industry. The aim of the
Doctoral School is to train PhDs in the field of stem cell research and
related technologies, including developmental biology and cell replacement
therapies in regenerative medicine. The focal areas are early embryonic
development, transgene technologies, and stem cell isolation and differentiation
in relation to stem cell-based therapies including brain, liver, pancreas,
intestines, mesenchymal tissues (skeletal muscle, cartilage, bone, heart)
and the blood and the immune system.
Denmark is loosing ground in stem cell research due to lack of funding,
but the existing researchers are well recognized globally and have published
several findings of international quality. For example, on June 3rd 2005,
the results of from two research groups at the University of Southern
Denmark and the University Hospital of Odense, Odense, Denmark, were published
in Science magazine.
According to Danish law, human life starts at the time of fertilisation.
Members of the Danish Council of Ethics have different views on which
sort of moral status the early embryo possesses. As a result, its members
also have different views on the ethical defensibility of undertaking
research into early embryos and, in the fullness of time perhaps, developing
therapies for serious disorders, treatment of which is based on embryonic
stem cells. Five members consider the moral status of the human embryo
such that embryonic stem cells must not be used; eleven members find that,
in principle, embryonic stem cells can be used as long as substantial
benefits are available for treating disease.Nine of the members able to
approve the use of embryonic stem cells in principle, however, find that
there is no pressing need at the present to allow embryonic stem cells
to be produced for research or possible treatment of disease, either by
cloning or by the in vitro technique, as known from IVF therapy. This
is because treating severe disease with stem cells is still only a theoretical
possibility, and manufacturing embryos for any purpose other than having
the embryo become a child may constitute a slide in values. Initially,
therefore, these members recommend that research into embryonic stem cells
be confined to embryos left over from IVF treatment. Finally, two members
feel that the use of therapeutic cloning with a view to research into
the treatment of severe disorders is ethically acceptable; providing such
research is carried out on very early embryos only, compare current legislation.
UK is highly regarded in Danish academic circles for their activities
in stem cell research. Danish researchers regularly attend courses in
UK and several Danish Ph.D. students spend 3-5 month of their studies
in UK. Partly due to the activities in DASCDOC, Denmark will be producing
a number of Ph.D.'s in stem cell research in the coming years. Since there
is no obvious added funding available to absorb these people there should
be an excellent opportunity to attract Danish Ph.D.'s to UK. It could
be advantageous for UK to sponsor visits to UK laboratories or conduct
another stem cell seminar in Denmark to promote UK.
|
 |
|
 |